NCL PRESS RELEASE: Withdrawal of Proposed Occupational Child Safety Rules for Agriculture Will Endanger Children Working on Farms

For immediate release: April 27, 2012
Contact: Reid Maki, (202) 207-2820, reidm@nclnet.org

Those of us concerned with the safety and welfare of children and teens working in agriculture are deeply disappointed by the Department of Labor’s decision to pull back on its effort to protect kids on farms.  “The all-out campaign of misinformation and distortion about the Department of Labor’s long overdue and important proposal to protect children working on farms will have an impact for years to come,” said Sally Greenberg, NCL’s executive director and a co-chair of the Child Labor Coalition, 28 organizations committed to protecting children from exploitative or dangerous work. 

“Agriculture is by far the most dangerous industry that large numbers of teens are allowed to work in,” said Greenberg. “Nearly 100 kids are killed performing hazardous farm work each year. Many of those kids work for wages. The Department of Labor’s sensible recommendations–based on years of research indicating the jobs in which teen injuries and deaths occur–sought to protect them. Unfortunately, the proposed rules fell victim to misinformation and exaggeration from groups like the National Farm Bureau and others that should know better.”

The reality is that agricultural work for teens is extremely dangerous: 

  • Between 1995 and 2002, an estimated 907 youths died on American farms, well over 100 per year. (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health)  
  • Last year, 12 of the 16 children under age 16 who suffered fatal occupational injuries worked in crop production. (Bureau of Labor Statistics)
  • Between 1992 and 2000, more than four in 10 work-related fatalities of young workers occurred on farms. 
  • Half of the fatalities in agriculture involved youth under age 15.
  • Just this past August, Oklahoma teens Tyler Zander and Bryce Gannon, both 17, each lost a leg in a grain auger accident. This accident would have been prevented by the proposed rules.
  • For agricultural workers 15 to 17, the risk of fatal injury is four times the risk for young workers in other workplaces, according to DOL’s Bureau of Labor Statistics

In the U.S., children who work on their parent’s farms are exempt from child labor laws. They can perform any task at any age. Other exemptions allow children to work for wages on other farms at the age of 12—and sometimes even younger. DOL’s proposed rules would have restricted youth from working in only the most dangerous tasks, allowing them to perform a wide array of farm jobs. Teens working in 4H or other educational and training programs were exempted under the regulations as well.

“The Department of Labor made every effort to be reasonable and flexible in proposing these safety regulations,” said Reid Maki, NCL’s Director of Social Responsibility and Fair Labor Standards and the coordinator of the Child Labor Coalition. “The rules continued to exempt kids working on their family farms and DOL indicated that the final rules would be expanded to exempt kids working the farms of relatives.”

More than 150 groups supported the proposed child safety rules. A list of those organizations can be found at www.stopchildlabor.org.

“We waited four decades for these badly needed safety updates and now they have been blocked by an overheated and exaggerated campaign of misinformation that trivialized critically-needed safety protections,” added Maki. “We estimate that 50-100 children could lose their lives without the added protections these rules provided.”

###

About the National Consumers League

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.

Facebook privacy

By Sally Greenberg, NCL Executive Director

The Wall Street Journal, of late, has done a very admirable muckracking job looking at privacy policies of Facebook, Skype, Yahoo and other sites. Why are privacy policies important to consumers? Because marketers want information about consumers so they can try to sell us stuff and in the process they dig deep for our personal data. And so the Facebooks, Skypes, and Yahoos of the world offer us access to their many fantastic applications – and many are fantastic – but only if we share information about ourselves.

The authors of a recent article in the Journal- Julia Angwin and Jeremy Singer-Vine, put it like this: “This appetite for personal data reflects a fundamental truth about Facebook, and by extension, the Internet economy as a whole: Facebook provides a free service that users pay for, in effect, by providing details about the lives, friendships, interests and activities.” And Facebook has 800-million-plus subscribers so that’s a lot of money.

You have to ask yourself why Facebook so highly valued – if it goes public it may be valued at $100 billion. Access to Facebook is free for consumers so we pay with our private information which Facebook then sells to advertisers. The Journal also says that Facebook isn’t always enforcing its own rules on data privacy. Dozens of apps apparently allow advertisers that haven’t been approved by Facebook.

Privacy proponents like Helen Nissenbaum, who wrote a book called “Privacy in Context,” are calling for digital “fences” around data usage and even the White House has called for consumers to be told how any data collected will be used. These are serious concerns for all of us who value our privacy and don’t want our personal data collected and sold. Hopefully this Journal series on privacy will get the ball rolling in that direction.

LifeSmarts finals live today!

Live from Philadelphia, PA — the 2012 National LifeSmarts Championship! A fun and dramatic weekend of competition has unfolded in Philly, where 32 teams have competed for a shot at the national title. The top 4 teams have been determined, with Florida’s Paxon School for Advanced Studies facing Pennsylvania’s team from Dallas High School at 9 am Eastern.

Watch the semi-finals matches live beginning at 9 am at www.lifesmarts.org! The FL-PA match will be followed by a face-off between Maryland’s Home Schoolers from Frederick and the team from Barrington High School in Rhode Island. The winners of those two teams will compete in the final match streamed live at www.lifesmarts.org.

Tune in!

Inside look at state LifeSmarts competition: part 5

The countdown to the 2012 National LifeSmarts Championship is reaching its end. Students and coaches will gather in Philadelphia in just a few days, and they’ve all worked very hard to earn the chance to represent their states at the national level. LifeSmarts Alumni, NCL Board member, and current LifeSmarts staffer Seth Woods attended the Kentucky state competition in and sent us blog postings that we’re serializing for five days this week to give our readers an inside look at a state competition. Enjoy!

By Seth Woods, LifeSmarts alumni

“We can accept that answer.”

And suddenly it was all over, the air rushed back into the room. Final score: Grant County 4-H 156, Mason County 163. The Royal Pains had completed their three-peat, and did so in truly dramatic style. They showed skill, intelligence, and courage—characteristics that will prove useful at the national tournament in Philadelphia.

Perhaps even more encouraging was Grant County’s response, a display of true sportsmanship: after one of the most heated matches I had ever seen, they were the ones that stretched their hands out first to their opponents. This gracious act touched me, because I wouldn’t have behaved the same way. Even though I could see the despair on their faces, watching their last chance at victory disappear (since most of them are graduating this year)–they had nothing to be ashamed of. These teens showed wisdom and maturity beyond their years. I wished them all the best as they headed for the door – returning to their community’s rebuilding efforts following the recent tornadoes that tore through their county.

And as the final pictures were snapped and the buzzers got packed into their boxes, I smiled, happy that I returned for another LifeSmarts tournament. I saw several familiar faces, and some new ones as well that will stay with me forever. This day reminded me that we all can learn something new, and our next generation can inspire greatness in us all. Next week will be my ten-year anniversary at the National LifeSmarts competition, and I can’t wait to see what will happen next.

Inside look at state LifeSmarts competition: part 4

The countdown to the 2012 National LifeSmarts Championship is reaching its end. Students and coaches will gather in Philadelphia in just a few days, and they’ve all worked very hard to earn the chance to represent their states at the national level. LifeSmarts Alumni, NCL Board member, and current LifeSmarts staffer Seth Woods attended the Kentucky state competition in and sent us blog postings that we’re serializing for five days this week to give our readers an inside look at a state competition. Enjoy!

By Seth Woods, LifeSmarts alumni

The next round in the state championship match was the team activity, and Heather Clary (our Question Master, from the BBB) looked at it in disbelief. “You have two minutes to complete this activity, start the clock,” she instructed, then turned around to the audience. She held up a sheet of paper covered in circles and arrows. “These kids have two minutes to explain how each branch of government checks and balances each of the other branches. I know I couldn’t do it,” she smirked. “I hope they’ve been paying attention in civics class.”

Based on the scores, it seemed they had—Mason County got a few more points, but it was still close. The Royal Pains led 73 to 66, which meant one Challenge question (worth 10 points each) could decide the game. This match contained 20 challenge questions, and by the time we had reached the final question, the lead had already changed three times. Grant County got nine right, and Mason another eight (if you do the math, that means only two of these difficult questions were not correctly answered). This kept the score very close: Grant 156, Mason 153. This was it. After all the studying, all the grueling qualification rounds, it all came down to the last question.

“Why is it important to be thorough and consistent when completing the identification section of a credit—”

Amrita Srinivasan, Mason County’s captain, had buzzed in. Her answer, a very detailed response, perked the ears of everyone in the room. The question master looked to judges Doug Graham and Van Shepard for a ruling. If they said yes, then Mason would have made history as the first back-to-back-to-back state champions. If they said no, Grant would finally taste the sweetness of redemption. My heart was racing, my eyes darting back and forth between both teams, the coaches on the edge of their seats. Now, at the very end of an exhausting marathon competition, their fate was in someone else’s hands.  Then, after what felt like hours of waiting, the judges shook their heads.

 

Salmonella outbreak news

And the outbreaks keep on coming! This current outbreak involves 20 states and the District of Columbia. So far 141 people have been sickened by the outbreak strain of Salmonella Bareilly and 21 of them have been hospitalized.

The outbreak has been linked to a yellow fin tuna product produced by Moon Marine. The product, known as Nakaochi Scrape, is tuna backmeat and is used in sushi products. Moon Marine has recalled its product. Right now, to be safe, consumers may want to avoid tuna sushi. CDC will continue to post updates as they are available and will continue to investigate the outbreak.

Inside look at state LifeSmarts competition: part 3

The countdown to the 2012 National LifeSmarts Championship is reaching its end. Students and coaches will gather in Philadelphia in just a few days, and they’ve all worked very hard to earn the chance to represent their states at the national level. LifeSmarts Alumni, NCL Board member, and current LifeSmarts staffer Seth Woods attended the Kentucky state competition in and sent us blog postings that we’re serializing for five days this week to give our readers an inside look at a state competition. Enjoy!

By Seth Woods, LifeSmarts alumni

The situation that was unfolding was nothing new: last year’s state championship was between Grant County and Mason County as well. In 2011, the Royal Pains from MCHS took the title with them to Los Angeles. Would history repeat, or could Grant County win the tickets to Philadelphia? Everything was on the line in the final match.

As a previous state champion, I knew that Mason County realized what was at stake. But I also recognized Grant County’s desire for redemption: although my team won in 2002, we came in last place in 2003. It wasn’t pretty; I displayed emotions on that day which can only be described in proper company as “unsportsmanlike.” (And, in retrospect, I made the right choice to not punch that kid from Manual in the face.) Having my own team go from first to last in a one-year span was humbling, and it strengthened my resolve to win in 2004—to study harder, think faster, take smarter risks when answering early. That determination helped us win then, and these teams would need it to win now.

The match started slow; several team-plus questions were left unanswered, and Mason was leading by a meager 10 points. Things picked up during the lightning rounds, as both teams surprisingly tore through difficult sets of questions about money management and carbon footprints. It was clear to me that both teams had prepared, especially Grant County, earning an astonishing 45 (out of 50) points. We were tied up again.

Inside look at state LifeSmarts competition: part 2

The countdown to the 2012 National LifeSmarts Championship is reaching its end. Students and coaches will gather in Philadelphia in just a few days, and they’ve all worked very hard to earn the chance to represent their states at the national level. LifeSmarts Alumni, NCL Board member, and current LifeSmarts staffer Seth Woods attended the Kentucky state competition in and sent us blog postings that we’re serializing for five days this week to give our readers an inside look at a state competition. Enjoy!

By Seth Woods, LifeSmarts alumni

Blog Post #2

By 2:30 p.m. on March 7 the Kentucky state LifeSmarts playoff bracket was set. McClanahan’s fast buzzer finger earned Grant County 4-H the top seed, and the team would face 4-seed Bracken County (my alma mater!) in the first semifinal. I will admit that I was biased in this match: coach Clay King was my geometry teacher, and their captain Eyan Duncan had shown great skill in the first two matches. I was hoping my BCHS Polar Bears could push through, but in the end Grant County took the game 185 to 116, an impressive effort on both sides.

The second semifinal was even more contentious, because these two teams had met earlier in the day. Mason County (which had slipped from first to second) faced Louisville’s DuPont Manual, a well-rounded crew captained by Eliza Coleman. Manual started the day out of contention, but was able to claw back with a last-minute win over a capable Bath County team starring Emilee Skaggs. This match, though, was a battle of old war horses: since 2008, Mason and Manual have been the only teams to win the state title. Now one of them was going home early. The score was neck and neck going into the Challenge round, but Mason captain Amrita Srinivasan was on a hot streak by the end. Final score: Manual 104, Mason 171.

Finally, by 4:00, it was time for the state championship, and everyone was exhausted. We had already seen ten fiery matches. I was physically and emotionally spent, and it was clear the students were pretty wiped out as well. But now we were finally there: two teams walked on stage, but only one would leave as champions.

We’ve come a long way, baby. Sort of

By Michell K. McIntyre, Director of NCL’s Special Project on Wage Theft

Today marks the day when the typical woman’s earnings catch up to those of her male counterpart’s from 2011. This year is also the 49th anniversary of the Equal Pay Act, signed into law by President John F. Kennedy in 1963 when women were averaging 56 cents for every dollar men made.

As the saying goes, ‘we’ve come a long way, baby,’ but we have a ways to go. Back in the 1960s, women had few career choices – nurse, teacher, or secretary. As illustrated in Mad Men, women who chose different career paths or tried to reach for more, such as Peggy Olson, were often ridiculed and made painfully aware of how little they were paid or respected in comparison to their male counterparts.

Today, American women are paid 77 cents for every dollar men are paid. This creates a $10,784 yearly wage gap and the numbers for minority women are worse. African-American women are paid only 62 cents and Hispanic women only 54 cents for every dollar paid to a white, non-Hispanic man. These wage gaps result in a loss of $19,575 for African-American women and $23,873 for Hispanic women every year. According to the Department of Labor, the wage gap between men and women translates to a loss of about $380,000 over a woman’s career.

The wage gap is not only a matter of injustice but is a matter of economic stability. According to the National Women’s Law Center, an additional $10,784 per year is enough to:

  • Pay the median cost of rent and utilities for a year with over $1,000 to spare or the median mortgage payment and utilities for over ten months
  • Feed a household of four for a year and five months with more than $300 to spare
  • Pay a year and a half of childcare cost for a four-year-old with over $100 to spare
  • Pay for two and a half years of family health insurance premiums in an employer-sponsored health insurance program with over $1,400 to spare

 

According to a Government Accountability Office study, the wage gap persists even when accounting for personal choices, such as work patterns and education. As reported by the National Partnership of Women and Families, working mothers pay a “penalty” for having children while fathers get a bonus. Nationally, women with children are paid 2.5 percent less than women without children, while men with children experience a boost of 2.1 percent over men without children. Education doesn’t seem to even the playing field. According to the National Partnership for Women and Families, women with professional degrees are paid just 67 cents for every dollar paid to men with professional degrees – women with doctoral degrees are paid less than men with master’s degrees and women with master’s degrees are paid less than men with bachelor’s degrees.

Not all hope is lost, in 2009 President Obama signed the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the first piece of legislation passed in the new administration. The legislation expanded workers’ rights to sue in a discrimination kind of case, and relaxed the statute of limitations, and restarting the six-month clock every time the worker receives a paycheck. But we need more to protect women and families. The Paycheck Fairness Act was reintroduced in 2011 in the House of Representatives by Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro with 177 co-sponsors (H.R. 1519) and reintroduced in the Senate by Senator Barbara Mikulski with 34 co-sponsors (S.797).

The Paycheck Fairness Act would:

  • Prohibit employers from retaliating against workers who discuss salaries with colleagues
  • Put gender-based discrimination on equal footing with other forms of wage discrimination – such as race or national origin – and allow women to take legal action for damages
  • Require employers to prove that pay differences exist for legitimate job related reasons
  • Create a negotiations skills training program for women and girls
  • Provide businesses (especially small ones) assistance with equal pay practices
  • Enhance the Department of Labor’s and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s ability to investigate and enforce pay discrimination laws

Unfortunately, both bills are sitting in committees and haven’t seen much play over the last few months especially with the campaign season ramping up. Its’ time to urge our lawmakers to due right by America’s women and families and pass the Paycheck Fairness Act.

For more information please visit the National Women’s Law Center, the National Partnership for Women & Families, the Department of Labor and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.